This video player requires Flash Player 10. If you are not able to watch the video, you may need to upgrade. Click here to install the latest version of Flash Player.

D-Town TV: Episode 20: Lenses Part 5

Published: July 9, 2009 Show Homepage

Lens options that fall in the budget price range, define some of the terminology that is used in the show, tip on macro focusing, Digital Photography Volume 3, and the benefits of using equipment like lens hoods, uv filters, circular polarizers, neutral density filters, and cleaning kits.
sponsors

Episode Summary

DTown TV is a weekly show brought to you by Scott Kelby and Matt Kloskowski with KelbyTraining.com.

Episode Summary

In this week's episode, Scott and Matt discuss:

  • Scott and Matt discuss lens options that fall in the budget price range
  • Scott had an adventure when he misplaced his camera gear. Read about it on his blog
  • Lensprotogo.com has wonderful options for renting camera lenses
  • Scott and Matt define some of the terminology that they use in the show
  • Moose Peterson has a quick tip on macro focusing
  • Scott's new book, Digital Photography Volume 3, is available for preorder now
  • Matt and Scott talk about the benefits of using equipment like lens hoods, uv filters, circular polarizers, neutral density filters, and cleaning kits
  • Check out the entire selection of Nikon lenses at the B&H Photo website

More Episodes

Show Discussions

post a comment

97

  1. Abdullhameed says:

    Just wanted to be the first to comment and say to you thank you so much guys for all these episodes.
    we still need more and more about Lenses.

    thanks to you all,,,

  2. Elliot says:

    Thanks for all the lens info.

    So now you’ve talked a lot about the lenses, but what about the bodies? What do you guys think of the various cameras, and which do you think we should skip or not for different situations?

  3. Jen says:

    Great show! Love what you guys talk about. One question specific to this episode… Isn’t it ‘aperture’ not ‘aperature’? they spelled it with an extra A every time it was written lol.

  4. Russ says:

    Guys,

    I love the show and look forward to many episodes to follow. I have a question I picked up some information on the web about new lenses and cameras that may be coming out from Nikon in the coming months. When do you guys find out about new offerings? Also as a new Nikon shooter I am wondering what the upgrade cycle is for Nikon and lastly when can we expect a D90 firmaware upgrade?

    Love the show keep it coming I have used many of the tips to modify my programming of my D90.

    Thanks for the great work

  5. Jim says:

    Regarding filters – there are those photographers who maintain that putting a low cost piece of glass (a U.V. filter) in front of a very expensive lens reduces the sharpness of the photograph.

    Have Scott or Matt either noticed any difference in quality or sharpness of the photo when using (or not using) a protective filter?

  6. Joseph Flores says:

    Thanks for these great videos! They teach a lot of stuff that you just don’t get anywhere else. You guys are also really funny! Now seriously though… which lens should I buy?

  7. Dan says:

    Hey guy,

    What a grate episode to wrap up the lens series. I can not wait to get my hands on Scott’s new book, I have volume 1&2 and I recommend them to everyone and anyone looking into learn more about photography.

    Don’t forget to stop by and take a look at my work. http://www.redbubble.com/people/EctoOne

  8. Mike Wharton says:

    Thanks for a great series on lenses. In fact, thanks for a fantastic podcast. I have found it so helpful. I am new to Nikon after being a Canon user for many years.

    Fantastic guys!!!!

    Mike Wharton
    Australia

  9. Barbara Okun says:

    Your shows are awesome! I’m learning so much. With the filters that you mentioned. Which brand is the best one to get?

  10. Roger says:

    Great shows!

    One annoying thing…..Could it be possible to have a thicker carpet on the table to help reduce the noise caused by hands, kockles, hitting the table, please. It is distracting…

    Keep up the good works.

    Thanks

  11. Philip says:

    One thing I think y’all should have mentioned about the 50mm f 1.8 lens is that if you own a D60, D40, or any other DX camera, you can’t auto focus with the lens. Only the 50mm f 1.4 will auto focus on a DX body. I was dissapointed to find that out when I whent to buy that lens for my D60. Great lens otherwise!! Got some great photos in low light with it.

  12. Krist says:

    Hey guys, great show !
    Thanks for putting this stuff together and most of all for making it available for FREE ! These shows are almost as good as Scott’s books :-)
    One small comment on the studio setting; it is really hard to see all the nice gear you have on the table, because it’s a black table and most of the gear is black too.
    Thanks and keep on going …

  13. John Bamber says:

    Great series on lenses and earlier on wireless flash. Thanks for all your hard work. For those of us who don’t use a studio how about a basic tutorial on using an attached Speedlight?

  14. Mike J says:

    Great info on lenses episodes! Thanks!
    I wear glasses also. I don’t like live veiw. But, mashing my glasses to the veiwfinder? Any help Scott?
    Can we get one episode for people who’s eyes might not be 20/20?

  15. Daf says:

    Quick note on loosing lens hoods. Came across this site a while ago – print out + cut out lens hoods! Lens specific too.
    Not tried it myself yet but should do – lost the hood to my Tokia 12-24

    http://www.lenshoods.co.uk/

  16. mtpeke says:

    I love these shows. Would love to see in future webisodes… tips on cleaning cameras and cleaning lenses.

  17. Hello guys, I appreciate these wonderful Nikon tutorials, they clarify much more the confusing contents of the manuals.

    I would like to ask if you would consider a tutorial with the SB 800 flash, it would help a lot!

    Thanks!

    Ricardo

  18. Thanks for your wonderful tutorials! Would you consider the possibility of some tutorials in using the SB800 Nikon flash?

  19. Hey Scott and Matt,

    It’s Paul from LensProToGo. Thanks a lot for the shout out! If anyone wants to reserve some Nikon gear or has any questions feel free to give us a ring at 877-578-4777.

    And remember that NAPP members receive 10% off all camera bodies and super telephoto lenses.

    Thanks,
    Paul

  20. Mohamed Ali says:

    Thanks a lot and congrats on another great show! Hope you guys can shed some light [groan! :D ] on pop up flashes on an upcoming episode. Thanks again! :)

  21. Todd says:

    I am not a real fan of UV etc filters for the protection of the lens because of how it can alter the color of the image. I am surprised that nobody has mentioned the Nikon NC (No color) filter. It is an optically clear screw on filter (just like UV) but it does nothing to the image. You can find it a B&H as well.

  22. [...] Episode 20: Lenses Part 5 | Episodes | D-Town TV [...]

  23. Zdravko Stoimenov says:

    The last show was absolutely superb. Very interesting info about lenses and filters. I would really like the lenses series to continue. There so much to cover. Keep up the good work guys!

  24. Nik says:

    Great show but I think you added to the confusion around using FX lenses on DX bodies in this episode. You stated that when using a non DX lens on a DX body you have to multiply the lens by the 1.5 crop factor, but this is also true of DX lenses, not just FX so there is really no difference with using an FX lens on a DX body in this respect.

    There advantages of using an FX lens on a DX body, less vignette and distortion. However there is one exception and that is fish-eye lenses, an FX fish-eye does not work properly on a DX body.

  25. Tom Hargreaves says:

    I second Mike J’s hope for some info on taking pitchurs while wearing glasses. My correction is greater than what is available with the diopter adjustment on my D200 so I have to wear my glasses. This pushes my eye away from the viewfinder enough that I can’t see the entire frame at once. I make do, but it would be nice to see the (almost) full frame, especially when I’m doing product work in the studio.

    Y’all do absolutely superb work!
    Tom

  26. nick says:

    hello guys
    i suggest next in the lens series the 200,300,400,500 and 600mm nikons
    and one with the 10.5 and 16mm fusheyes as well as the ultra wides such as the 10-24, 12-24, 14-24, 17-35 etc

  27. Andrew says:

    It’s more than double the price one has to pay for a 50mm f1.4 lens as compared with a 50mm f1.8 lens.
    The advantage of a slightly faster lens can be offset by the wide range of ISO provided by new generation Nikon digital cameras!

  28. Lee Spencer says:

    Thank you for this great series on lenses. You guys rock!

  29. Owen says:

    In the Lens podcasts talk you about the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G SIC SW Prime Nikkor Lens. I have the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D AF Nikkor Len. Do I need to upgrade or can I continue with the older len? What advances do I get with the newer len? Are the advances worth the cost? I really don’t use the 50mm len that often perfering the 85mm 1.4 instead.

    Love the podcasts.

  30. Victor Fomino says:

    Just a thing related to this site.
    Starting 2 weeks ago I have problems loading this site, meaning it takes 5 to 10 (or more ) minutes to load.
    Is something I have to do? Does anybody has same issue?

    Thank you,

  31. Khalid says:

    hi

    nice vid .. i want to ask how to keep my from Moisture ..

    case every time i go out the lens become a big drop of water !!

  32. Ed says:

    Hi Guy’s
    I can’t thank you enough for all your tips. I have updated my firmware, auto ISO, One push zoom in and I am learning all the time. Thank You Thank You. Ed

  33. Walter says:

    Can you guys review Carl Zeiss lenses? I want to know if they are worth buying and what you guys think. Thanks.

  34. Erik says:

    I thinking there should be an episode on cleaning sensors, how to remove dust, exc.

  35. Daniel says:

    Hi, I´m 15 and I´m from Germany and I want to say THANK YOU for these great shows. In the last episodes you spoke about lenses, maybe you could say more about the bodies and which “pro´s and con´s” they have in the next shows! You could also talk about camera bags and maybe show your own ones and how you´ve packed it, that would be great!!

    - Daniel :)

  36. Yvan says:

    Hi Matt, Scott,

    I am from France and I am shotting with D200 and D700 at the moment, mostly by travelling in eastern europe and asia. I discovered your web site a few days ago, and I already seen all of your shows. It is more than useful for me because it helps me to improve my language in the same times, like Glass or 90 boxs which I didn’t know before. So congratulations for what you are doing in your different podcasts, great job guys.

    Cheers
    Yvan

  37. Paul says:

    Just discovered D-Town. As a very long time Nikon user and fan I appreciate your opinions about all things Nikon.

    Here’s my question. I have a D80 with the 18-200 VR lens. I, like you, love this lens and use it almost exclusively. I have noticed on my open sky pictures a noticeable amount of vignetting when the lens is wide open and know that this can be corrected by stopping down or in post production. However, when I am in Automatic mode or P mode, Nikon wants to open the lens up and favors a higher shutter speed over aperture priority. Therefore, the only way I can correct this is to go into Aperture priority mode and set a higher aperture to prevent the vignetting. Of course when I do this, I lose the metering and focus benefits of shooting in Auto mode.

    Is there any other way I can shoot with this lens and stay in auto mode and prevent the vignetting?

    Finally, perhaps you could explain what vignetting means and other lens aberrations as part of a future show.

    Keep up the great works guys.

  38. Bogdan Cornea says:

    Hy,
    I want to ask you about the Nikkor 80-200 mm f:2,8 AF-D.It is a good lens?
    I have a D300 and i want to buy a telephoto lens at a good price for a good quality.Tell me yor advice about this?
    Best regards
    B.

  39. nick says:

    Great sight,
    I don’t understand why doesn’t Nikon just list the focal range of their DX lenses using the 1.5 crop factor. Nikon digital cameras all have a 1.5 crop factor (unlike Canon digital cameras, which have about three different crop factors depending on model), therefore a 18-200 would be listed as a 27-200 and only FX lenses need to be factored by 1.5. (I can’t imagine why you would use a DX lens on a FX body). Now you have to multiply all their DX lens listed focal ranges by 1.5.

    thanks for the show

  40. Markku says:

    I don’t mind the black t-shirts, however, if you would just stop knocking on the table… It really is annoying. ;) Great show anyway.

  41. Kishore says:

    This is a great show, have been following this since episode one.
    Got a question – what about the 80-200 AF-D for a d90 , because its much less than the 70-200 AF-S VR at the loss of VR and AF-S but give the fast 2.8.
    would you consider it better than the 70-300 AF-S VR.
    thanks

  42. Amoxtli says:

    Hi,
    Great show. I particularly enjoyed the five episodes on lenses very much. I understand you were reviewing the gear that you use, but I do wish though you would do an episode on third party lenses. Some of these lenses such as the Tamron macros or the Tokina wide angles are excellent lenses. Something on Nikkor specialty lenses such as the 10.5mm f/2.8 or the PC 45mm f/2.8D ED would also be very informative.

  43. Michael says:

    Great show, guys, BUT you misspelled “aperture” at least 3 times on this show. Shame :-(

  44. I have to comment on the series.
    I loved it. I picked up knowledge and tips that I either did not have or had but didn’t apply it.
    I am so happy you put this series together and look forward to more.
    I am also happy that you have a series that focuses on my camera brand.
    Thank you.

    Michael

  45. Anthony says:

    I still don’t understand how the two of you, (Scott and Matt) have the time to do these shows every week! Between your PS/LR books and blogs alone you are a wealth of information. Thank You for all of your hard work. Others have mentioned ‘real world’ examples outside of the studio. That is too time consuming. Maybe just an extra: “We do this for that, this way, and here’s why” would satisfy them. Great series!

  46. Bogdan Cornea says:

    Hello
    You have great show.I have a question – what about the 80-200 AF-D for a D300 , because its much less than the 70-200 AF-S VR at the loss of VR and AF-S but give the fast 2.8.
    This is it better than the 70-300 AF-S VR.
    Please response me because i want to buy one of this lens.
    I want this for sports, nature and wildlife

  47. Josh says:

    I am a Canon shooter and I love watching and learning all the tips and information you guys give. I take in the information you give for the Nikon side and I translate it to the Canon side. A lot of the things you guys discuss can be applied to the Canon. Also most of the features of the Nikon camera that you discuss i’ve actually found in my Canon. Maybe under a different name or menu but i’ve found it. Thanks guys awesome!!!!!!

  48. Jonathan Wylie says:

    Where is the love for the 55-200VR? I don’t think it was mentioned in any of the 5 parts.

  49. Mel Wilner says:

    Can you mention the use of the NIKON DC lenses. I believe one is still available at B&H. 105 f2.0 DC and the 135 f2.0 DC.
    Thanks,

    DR. Mel Wilner NYC

  50. Colby says:

    Regarding lens filters, I used to buy cheaply priced UV filters for protection, but since i started buying “higher” quality lenses i’ve been told by the sales rep to get better filters with “more coats” or something. Since then, i’ve been buying B+W filters which are said to be “better” but they are also pricier. There are also many different versions of UV for each filter size. I know there are also nikon Filters which are very expensive, and was wondering the advantages of the pricier UV filters over cheaper ones. Thanks!

  51. Marcelo Rescala says:

    Guys,

    Great show, thank you very much for so many great tips and for sharing all your knowledge.
    I’ve got two questions for you related to filters:
    1.I always have my UV filter on my lenses. If i want to put on the circular polarizer, do i have to remove the UV filter or can i leave it on?
    2. While using the circular polarizer i noticed dark areas in the corners (vignetting) in same photos without being able to relate this with any particular shutter speed or aperture used. Any idea?

    Thanks again,
    Marcelo

  52. Scott Schaffer says:

    I just got a D90 with the typical kit lens (18-55mm with the higher aperture (not the greatest for low light indoors/outdoors. I am looking for a “Swiss army knife” type of lens that is a zoom that is a f2.8 that will work well with my church’s upcoming Vacational Bible School.

    I need a multi-purpose zoom lens with low aperture (f2.8). What would you guys recommend??

  53. Rogier Bos says:

    Oh man – Nikon just came out with some updates to some of their more popular lenses… Now you guys need to do a lenses-part 6 episode!
    :-)

    On a more serious note (and I realize this may be a little specialized), but I would love for you guys to demonstrate how you use a Perspectice Control Lens well. I am considering buying the 24mm version for architecture and product photography, but find myself hesitating because I am not sure how to use such a lens, and if it will do what I am hoping it will.

    Peace,
    Rogier
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  54. Skip Harless says:

    Just watched Episode 20 (I’m a little behind) and wanted to share a real life horrifying tidbit. Recently while shooting a 5k race my D700 with a 17-35 lens slipped off my shoulder. It hit the sidewalk lens down and it shattered. I thought the worst but I was elated to find that it was only the $24 lens hood that shattered without any other damage. Always, always use a lens hood.

    Great show, guys!

    Best regards,

    Skip

  55. Aclim says:

    I have dificulty to watch this episode cause it stop at around 8 mins after playing… I try this few time, but problem still persist, anyone can help?

  56. Kent Staubus says:

    I have some of Nikon’s best lenses but have never used a UV filter for “protection.” I am an outdoor/adventure photographer, and photo almost daily in tough conditions. My lenses are perfect. I do use the lens hood and tough plastic lens cap every time though. Problem with UV filters for me is I do get random flare/ghosting, even with quality B+W mrc coated ones. It would actually be cheaper for me to pay to replace an occasional front lens element than to have expensive high quality multi-coated filters on each one. Don’t see the point in using UV filter except maybe in very hazardous conditions. Modern lens coatings are actually very hard. I’ve never once had a problem. As for polarizers, I don’t leave home without one. I am careful to only use the high quality multi-coated ones though.

  57. Brad says:

    Jim,
    Fred Picker of Newfane, Vt. did extensive tests with a view camera & lenses with and without filters. His findings were that the use of filters, such as a UV filter for protection, increased the chances of introducing lens flare, reduced sharpness, and chromatic aberration since the filter adds two more surfaces of glass to the lens. Hence he uses Kodak gels for filtration effects. Ansel Adams also felt that the use of glass filters increased the chance of adverse effects showing up in the negative. The only filters I use are a polarizer and a Variable ND filter. I don’t keep a UV filter on my lenses for protection but instead rely upon a lens shade (I always use them), common sense, and being aware of my surroundings to keep my lenses in great shape. So far (after 35 years of shooting), I’ve never had a problem – never dropped a lens or camera, never banged one into the side of a building, never used one as a weapon. Other folks swear by a UV filter for lens protection. My advice – try one. Take a bunch of photos with and without a filter, enlarge the images and compare them. As I said, speaking for myself only, I don’t use them and always felt this was more of a salesman’s ploy to relieve me of some of my hard-earned money rather than being a necessity.

  58. bigmouth says:

    Is this the same Brad the assistant to Scott and others? Can’t be. You sounded totally deviated from your boss’s tone. I tend to agree with you though. Nowadays, a 77mm multi-coated UV filter from B+W costs something like $130. It’s like 15-20% of a $600 lens. And because we fear of those cheapo filters may degrade image quality and we fear about all the catastrophes, we suck it up and buy them. A bit absurd, really.

  59. Philip says:

    I used the 52mm Quantaray Skylight 1A filter on my 50mm f 1.8 lens during a shoot the other night, and though I had to manually focus because that lens was not built to auto focus on my camera, the images that did come out nice and sharp and in focus didn’t seem to be any less sharp than the images I’ve taken before with my other lens (that will auto focus on my camera) while not using a filter. And it only cost me $12.00 at Ritz camera.

  60. Brad Moore says:

    Nope, not me :) You’ll see my picture on my posts.

    Brad Moore
    DTown TV Technical Editor

  61. Walt says:

    Phillip,
    Nikon now makes a 50mm 1.8 that auto focuses on the D40/D60 and it runs about $199. I believe they also make a 50mm 1.4 that will autofocus on the D40/D60 but it’s got a hefty $499 price tag.

    Walt

  62. Flea says:

    That is not true about all dx camera’s as far as focas goes, just the cheap ones d40 d60 d5ooo.

  63. Daf says:

    There are numerous differnt eye-cups you can get – from both Nikon and other suppliers.
    e.g. http://www.europe-nikon.com/family/en_GB/categories/broad/133.html
    If you get a larger, softer one – it might be better for you.

  64. Rhoda says:

    It may sound strange… but I can wear my lens hood as a bracelet to keep it close yet free up my hands.

  65. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Hey Ricardo. Check out episodes 4-6.
    - Matt K

  66. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Hi Roger. I fear that no matter how thick of a carpet you put on there we’re going to bang it and rattle things against it anyway. Trust me, no matter how dummy proof you try to make our set, we’ll find a way to distract and annoy people. I like to think of it as our charm but others may find it bothersome… oh well :)

    - Matt K

  67. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Russ. We could tell you but then we’d have to kill you. Sorry :)
    For obvious reasons, even if we did know something (which we don’t) we wouldn’t be able to share it anyway. I’m sure you can understand, and its really the same with any company out there. They’ll never publicly announce new products until they’re ready to stop making money with the old ones.

    - Matt K

  68. Russ says:

    Matt,

    Even though you have threatened to kill me :-) I still love the show and appreciate the up to date information. Keep up the great work and I will keep watching. As a new Nikon shooter it is really great to have this show as a referance. I look forward to even more great knowledge and tips in the coming weeks.

    Thanks
    Russ

  69. Philip says:

    Realy? I didn’t see that 50mm 1.8 listed on there site and ever stor I’ve talked to tells me Nikon dosn’t. Do you know where I could get it?

  70. Walt says:

    Hey Phillip,

    I bought my nikon 50mm 1.8 from B&H in NYC via online. It’s very new and may still be hard to come by, mine was backordered 3 weeks plus, however it may be more readily available now. I’ve had mine for about 5 weeks and love it. Works awesome in lower light conditions.

    Walt

  71. Walt says:

    Phillip,
    I apologize The lens i bought was a 35mm 1.8 sorry.
    Walt

  72. Walt says:

    Being kind of nit picky aren’t you. Did I spell aren’t correctly.
    Walt

  73. Suzanne says:

    I ’second’ the motion to do an espisode on the SB-800….thx, am enjoying and learning from the episodes…

  74. Philip says:

    I was gonna say… I looked at B&H after reading your reply and didn’t see the lens for sale there either, but I did see that 35mm f 1.8 lens. How do you like it?

  75. Philip says:

    I apologize for that. I couldn’t remember witch camera worked with that lens, out of all of the dx bodies the guy at the store tried it on. But after looking at the lens as it’s listed on B&H photo’s web page, you are right it won’t work on the D40, D60, and as I remember from the store the D5000. You have to get the 50mm f 1.4 in order to have the auto focus ability. But I did find out that at least with the D60 you can turn on the rang finder option and when the bar at the bottom of the view finder is centered you’re in focus for your main focal point and will get a nice sharp image.

  76. Al Marsh says:

    Please stop the killing. I’ll tell you everything. Just don’t kill Russ. First Chase Jarvis outed the possible Nikon future product list on Wired at this URL ( http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2009/07/nikon-roadmap-d4-d4x-d700x-d3000-others.html ). He was referring to either one or both blog entries on Wired here ( http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/nikon-d300s-and-d3000-photos-possibly-leaked/ ) or perhaps the one here ( http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/entire-nikon-2009-2010-dslr-product-roadmap-leaked/ ). Bottom line is a D300s with video unless someone made it up.

    I’m sorry, Wired. I had to protect some guy named Russ. Lock your doors because Matt is on his way with his Nikon Deputy badge and a license to kill (D007). Actually, Matt can go right through those doors with his polarizer. He ADMITTED on the video that he always carries one! Now you know why.–Al

  77. Walt says:

    Hey Phillip,
    I did some photo work for a neighbors graduation/pool party and most of the i shot with the nikon 18-200, however when it got dark even with some outside yard and porch lites i could’nt get the camera to focus it was like searching to focus and was struggling. I switched over to the
    nikon 35 1.8 and it worked awesome in even darker conditions as i walked home, just a few minutes away and back to the party. I think the pictures taken in the dark were even better than the photos taken in the daytime with the 18-200. withe the 35mm 1.8 you just have to physically zoom in by walking in closer to your subjects. I love the lens and at $199.00 its a bargain. From what i understand and i may be wrong the 35 on a DX body is equivalent to a 50 mm on a fx frame camera.
    Gotta go for now
    Walt

  78. Walt says:

    Khalid,
    Just a couple of questions out of curiousity. Are you keeping your gear in a highly airconditioned space and then going into a very hot/humid enviorment? What kind of case are you storing your gear in?
    These may play a factor with your problem of moisture.
    Walt

  79. Erik says:

    My bad, I meant to say “I’m thinking.”
    By the way, awesome website/great show!

  80. Roger says:

    I Matt,

    It’s mostly the ‘drum playing’ by Scott…:-))

    Roger

  81. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Sorry Mikel. We’ll let the edeters no.

    - Matt K :)

  82. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Hi Markku,
    I commented on this earlier in the comments (from Roger), but the gist of it is, we’re annoying people. If its not the color of our shirts, its the way we say something. If its not the way we say something its the banging on the desk. We just can’t help ourselves. My best suggestion if these things get annoying is to turn off the volume (so you don’t hear the banging) and turn off the video (so you don’t see the black shirts – even though you don’t mind them). Trust me, we’re much less annoying if you do those things ;)

    - Matt K

  83. Dave says:

    Good answer, Matt. I hope no one got annoyed….

  84. George says:

    I purchased the 50mm 1.4 plannar for my D3 and its amazing, so crips and the bokeh is beautiful, take note that all are manual focus :)

  85. George says:

    really not worth it!
    YES the 85 1.4 is stunning :)

  86. Walt says:

    Matt,
    Love that attitude. You guys put out so much good info, you’d think people would overlook bull#$%$. Keep up the great job. Did I spell
    bull#$%$ correctly?
    Walt

  87. Bogdan Cornea says:

    Hy,
    I want to ask you about the Nikkor 80-200 mm f:2,8 AF-D.It is a good lens?
    I have a D300 and i want to buy a telephoto lens at a good price for a good quality.Tell me yor advice about this?
    Best regards
    B.

  88. Kishore says:

    Hey Bogdan,
    I am in the same confusion as yours, after reading several reviews i discovered that the 70-200 has the inbuilt motor and comes with VR ( 3 stops ) vr and af-s come very handy and they are a wonderful feature to have. however if budget is the concern then the 80-200 af-d will do the job perfectly and you will surely find a way out to handle the vr by using a tripod

  89. Matt Kloskowski says:

    Hey Jonathan,
    Remember, the shows were just about “our” favorites. We don’t have or use that lens so it would be hard to talk, comment about, or recommend it.

    Thanks
    - Matt K

  90. Michael says:

    You know I have always been paying too close attention to the info you guys are sharing I guess cause I have never noticed the noises from the table so many people are complaining about. Thanks guys

  91. Scott Diussa says:

    Well… Scott does play drums, too. So I guess he just can’t help himself!

  92. Scott Diussa says:

    Marcelo,

    These are actually two very related questions… If you stack filters on top of each other then you may experience vignetting in the corners of your image due to the thickness of the filter ring(s). That’s what I think is happening in #2 as well. The more expensive filters are usually larger in size than the filter thread size to keep the filter from vignetting. Cheaper filters are the same size as the lens and vignetting tends to happen on those more especially with wider angle lenses.

    Hope this answers your questions…
    Scott

  93. Ken Elliott says:

    Polarizers work best when you are 90 degrees to the sun. At that angle, light is highly polarized. When you are pointed directly toward the sun, or directly away, the polarizer is less effective. Normally, this is not a big concern.

    But a wide angle lens may have a problem with this. Some of the super wide lenses can cover a wide range of the sky. Let’s say you have the sun at your back and use a 18mm lens. In the center area, the light is not polarized, so the filter can’t really darken the sky much. But the sky near the edges of your image might be highly polarized and this will let the filter darken them greatly. You’ll also notice a difference top-to-bottom. So it might not be vignetting. Try taking a series of shots, moving in a full circle. If this is the cause, you’ll see the north and south sky looking different from the east and west sky. Altering the aperture will not have an effect on this.

    But the other issue is this could be caused by stacking filters, or using filters with “thick” (long) mounting rims that extend into the picture area. When used with a wide angle lens, you may need a thin (short) mount filter. Stopping down the aperture (bigger number) will also reduce this effect.

  94. Scott Diussa says:

    Nick,

    A focal length is a focal length… the numbers are what they are and if they were to represent something they are not then it would get really confusing. It’s a different format if a photographer has never shot any FX/35mm equipment in the past then the DX numbers would look perfectly normal to that photographer.

  95. Marcelo Rescala says:

    Thanks, really helpful tips.

Leave a Reply