<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 19: Lenses Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/</link>
	<description>D-Town TV is a fresh approach to teaching camera tips and photographic techniques to today&#039;s digital photographers with Scott Kelby and Matt Kloskowski as its hosts. No matter what the skill level or interest, each episode covers a wide variety of topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:29:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy A.</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-5359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-5359</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t seem to link to that Nikon Alphabet. Every time I click the link I just get a link back to the episodes page. Is there another link to it?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t seem to link to that Nikon Alphabet. Every time I click the link I just get a link back to the episodes page. Is there another link to it?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>I just watched the bit about the lenses and it seem somewhat misleading. If you put FX 12-24mm on a DX body you will get about 16-33mm (as mentioned). But the same is true if you use the DX 12-24mm. If I put the 35mm 1.8DX on my DX body it will still be about 49mm it is still not 35mm.

Further more if i put the 12-24mm DX lens on my FX body..it will not crop the image. I will get 12mm but you will see the barrel on the edges. I have the 12-24mm DX lens and can only use it at 18mm-24mm without getting the barrel in frame. So at 24mm I will get a full 12.1mp image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the bit about the lenses and it seem somewhat misleading. If you put FX 12-24mm on a DX body you will get about 16-33mm (as mentioned). But the same is true if you use the DX 12-24mm. If I put the 35mm 1.8DX on my DX body it will still be about 49mm it is still not 35mm.</p>
<p>Further more if i put the 12-24mm DX lens on my FX body..it will not crop the image. I will get 12mm but you will see the barrel on the edges. I have the 12-24mm DX lens and can only use it at 18mm-24mm without getting the barrel in frame. So at 24mm I will get a full 12.1mp image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karzeni</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>karzeni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>Hello Richard, the 18-70 DX VR does not exist at least without the VR ability.

That lens was known as one of the sharpest consummer zoom lens until the 16-85 VR but still has advantage of larger aperture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Richard, the 18-70 DX VR does not exist at least without the VR ability.</p>
<p>That lens was known as one of the sharpest consummer zoom lens until the 16-85 VR but still has advantage of larger aperture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>Joe and Blue, I&#039;m with you on that question.  Moose must have been in a big hurry that day!  Last week I sent an &quot;Ask Brad&quot; on that topic but haven&#039;t heard anything yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe and Blue, I&#8217;m with you on that question.  Moose must have been in a big hurry that day!  Last week I sent an &#8220;Ask Brad&#8221; on that topic but haven&#8217;t heard anything yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Siegel</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>just for the sake of argument, has anyone including Scott or Matt, had any experience with the Nikor 18~70 DX VR zoom lens? i do mostly landscape fine art so i need a better quality lens than the 18~200 seems able to give me. stupid me, i sold my 70~200 which was a dynamite lens when i wanted a better quality lens below the 70~200 i had in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just for the sake of argument, has anyone including Scott or Matt, had any experience with the Nikor 18~70 DX VR zoom lens? i do mostly landscape fine art so i need a better quality lens than the 18~200 seems able to give me. stupid me, i sold my 70~200 which was a dynamite lens when i wanted a better quality lens below the 70~200 i had in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>No episode this week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No episode this week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beamer</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>Beamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>You are technically correct, but I DO think it helps people understand the &quot;practical&quot; ramifications of shooting with a 300mm on a crop camera to say you effectively get 450mm.

Your statement about the 300 still having 300mm &quot;perspective&quot; is why I LOVE shooting with my 60mm Micro on my d90. I get the effective field of view of a 90mm lens but without so much telephoto compression. The macro images have a very nice 3D feel to them that would be flattened somewhat if I were actually shooting with a 90mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are technically correct, but I DO think it helps people understand the &#8220;practical&#8221; ramifications of shooting with a 300mm on a crop camera to say you effectively get 450mm.</p>
<p>Your statement about the 300 still having 300mm &#8220;perspective&#8221; is why I LOVE shooting with my 60mm Micro on my d90. I get the effective field of view of a 90mm lens but without so much telephoto compression. The macro images have a very nice 3D feel to them that would be flattened somewhat if I were actually shooting with a 90mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4378</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4378</guid>
		<description>They do know of the 10-24 because it&#039;s been mentioned on Scott Kelby&#039;s blog. I think they recommend the 12-24 for two reasons: gold ring professional lens and constant aperture. The 10-24 needs to be out a little longer before it enjoys a reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do know of the 10-24 because it&#8217;s been mentioned on Scott Kelby&#8217;s blog. I think they recommend the 12-24 for two reasons: gold ring professional lens and constant aperture. The 10-24 needs to be out a little longer before it enjoys a reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve enjoyed the DTown series but I think you all should issue a clarification on the FX vs DX lens stuff. You&#039;ve been perpetuating a misconception into the cropping issue. The focal length never changes between FX and DX. Just the field of view changes. When you refer to a 300mm lens as being a 450 on DX cameras that&#039;s actually not true. It&#039;s still a 300mm lens with the 300mm perspective. It&#039;s just that you get less of the image captured than with a larger sensor. You all know that but I think clarifying it will help people avoid mistakes in perception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed the DTown series but I think you all should issue a clarification on the FX vs DX lens stuff. You&#8217;ve been perpetuating a misconception into the cropping issue. The focal length never changes between FX and DX. Just the field of view changes. When you refer to a 300mm lens as being a 450 on DX cameras that&#8217;s actually not true. It&#8217;s still a 300mm lens with the 300mm perspective. It&#8217;s just that you get less of the image captured than with a larger sensor. You all know that but I think clarifying it will help people avoid mistakes in perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://kelbytv.com/dtowntv/2009/07/02/episode-19-lenses-part-4/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dtowntv.com/?p=596#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>Much thanks Scott!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much thanks Scott!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
